Monday, March 04, 2013

Gross Incompetence

Today I've taken some guff from folks that are a bit upset about my skepticism about the Fed's estimates of the money supply.  Its not that big a deal some said... banks know what they have on deposit.. say others.

oh...  oh well that's comforting.  Well then I shouldn't be bothered by the fact... that the FED steals ideas on estimation... from freaking biologists.

What follows... comes directly from a fed white paper on currency over-seas.  The first crazy thing we learn when reading this paper... is that the Fed has no damned clue how much US currency is actually out there... or where it is.  Are you getting this?  They don't know where the damned money is... or how much is gone... and apparently... they think this is one good way to try to take a guess at it.  I give you... The Fish Method:

"The biometric method, also known as the “fish” method, applies a method developed by 
Petersen (1893) to estimate fish populations to cash processing data to obtain estimates of the 
“populations” of notes in the United States and the rest of the world. In the biological 
application, populations are estimated by capturing some animals, tagging them, releasing them, 
and then recapturing another sample of animals later. Assuming that both samples are 
representative, the share of tagged animals in the general population should be the same as the 
share of tagged animals in the second sample, and the population can thus be estimated. More 
formally, suppose M animals out of N total are captured and tagged. Next, suppose that in the 
second sample, m tagged animals are found out of n captured. Assuming that both samples were 
representative, the share of tagged animals in the second sample, m/n, should be equal to share of 
all tagged animals, M, in the general population, N, or m/n = M/N. Since M, m, and n are known, 
N can be estimated as N=(n/m)*M"



Whiskey.

Tango.

Foxtrot.


Seriously... these people are supposed to be traders.  They are supposed to have degrees in  economics... which... oh look... is a science.  That means... they should've gone to school... with other science majors... where they should've learned... that biologist suck at math.  People!  You're better off getting help with your differential equations assignment from hungover elementary ed majors.

But hey.. that's ok... they have another method... which they call the seasonal method... which apparently works great... as long as you assume there isn't much US currency in Canada.   No... no I am not making this up... and I did not rip it out of Python skit...  this is actually in the white paper... which from what I can tell is not actually a parody.

Modern economists are so bad at modeling... they are actually stealing ideas from biologists.

That should be the punchline of a nerd joke.  Not reality.

I want to close by quoting the paper directly again...  from the conclusions...

"In sum, much as in earlier work, the currently available data do not allow for precise 
estimates of foreign holdings of U.S. currency, and the available estimates are somewhat 
disparate.''


7 comments:

Flannel Avenger said...

I don't like the news you just gave me, so in a fit of spite I gave a donation to my AR Ammo Hoard in your name.

Nyeah.

Flannel Avenger said...

P.S. My Ammo Hoard thanks you for your generosity.

Lulabelle said...

" the available estimates are somewhat
disparate.'' "

Masters of subtlety there.
Around here, the standard response to a statement like this is "no shit, Sherlock".

freeonus said...

Sigh. Way back when, I considered majoring in economics but thought I wasn't math capable enough. But, what good is math without some common sense? I chose computer science instead - probably the better economic decision!

Susan said...

Having some experience working clerical jobs in a financial institution a few years ago, I can safely say that the financial policies of this country have little to do with reality.

So when I read here that economists are stealing ideas like this one, well, color me surprised. Not.

Res Ipsa said...

"banks know what they have on deposit"

The problem is which banks. The locally owned bank on the corner that has three branches around town, knows exactly what it has. The small retail community banks are normally on the level. As you go up the food chain in size to commercial banks, regional banks, multi-national banks, investment banks, central banks, the rules change. “Complexity” becomes code word for “doing what the stake holders want at the moment”. Honesty, accountability, integrity, be damned.

Nate said...

Why Res... don't you know? They lie and obfuscate for very good reasons... to... protect people! To protect the very economy! They are nobel!